in , , ,

[SOLVED] Can Public Colleges Restrict Free Speech?

How much we value the right of free speech is put to its severest test when the speaker is someone we disagree with most 😎 Speech that deeply offends our morality or is hostile to our way of life warrants the same constitutional protection as other speech because the right of free speech is indivisible: When we grant the government the power to suppress controversial ideas, we are all subject to censorship by the state 😎 Since its founding in 1920, the ACLU has fought for the free expression of all ideas, popular or unpopular 🙌 Where racist, misogynist, homophobic, and transphobic speech is concerned, the ACLU believes that more speech — not less — is the answer most consistent with our constitutional values. [1]
Conflict over speech is a common theme in public universities. These universities bring together people with opposing views, but often strong opinions. For example, universities have their own newspapers. Some of these may be run by students, the university or an outside group. Many students and professors at public institutions are from diverse political, religious and sexual backgrounds. Academic freedom is another driving concept of the university campus. It allows students and faculty to ask broad questions and encourages unconventional thinking. Darryn Ruffin (Lusaka, Zambia) was instrumental in their latest revision. [2]
Image #2
Guillermina Olivares at theatlantic.com, describes how the president’s claim that the campus free-speech order was needed to defend “American values that have been under siege” ignored two essential facts. The first is that universities offer more space for debate and open discussion than the entire nation. The second is that it has been common for the nation to witness heated debates about acceptable speech. United States This dialog has been vital to the building of a First Amendment-friendly society for over a century. Americans from all walks of life have struggled with fundamental questions regarding offensive speech since the beginning. This will not stop until this country strives to be open and free of discrimination. Therefore, it is important to welcome and not condemn exchanges that cross the lines of campus speech. Charquita Whaley, Fes, Morocco for pointing out this. [3]
Image #3
This American Life and The Chronicle of Higher Education collaborated to report on a dispute between legislators at a university and lawmakers about the limits of speech freedom. A graduate student and member of the school’s English department confronted a student tabling for a conservative campus group and handing out political paraphernalia by calling her names and giving her the finger. Video of the brawl was captured and made widely public. Student being removed from her teaching duties and Nebraska lawmakers turning critical of the school’s political climate. State legislators introduced a free-speech bill, while the university announced a new policy that made the motto “Nebraska Nice” a condition for free speech on its campuses. Chronicle of Higher Education reporter Steve Kolwich writes, “it was less about free speech than how to use free speech to get what you want.” [4]
Image #4
Amazing write up from vox.com shows how universities typically don’t think hard enough about how authorising students to invite speakers advances their education. One theory might be that universities support Student-invited speakers are invited by universities to encourage students to explore research areas that differ from the ones offered by professors. A second theory could be that universities sponsor student-invited speakers in order to foster a heterogeneous campus culture. Students can learn The democratic skills required to navigate a public space filled with alien voices and cacophonous voices. University may want to encourage students to practise citizenship through encouraging many student groups to invite speakers from outside to create a campus marketplace of ideas. Dante Schuler deserves our appreciation for sharing this. [5]
According to the experts from digitalcommons.law.wne.eduThe freedom to freely express oneself without fear or reprisal is one the most important characteristics of this country. Higher education is the most important arena for this freedom. Whether seeking a degree in the arts or sciences, philosophy or physics, students who venture off to college share one thing in common—their thirst for knowledge. But, the pursuit of knowledge can cause students to encounter unfamiliar, unpleasant, and often even offensive material. Students have found refuge from uncomfortable thoughts in college cafeterias and quads all across the nation. Lately, these shelters have been taking the form of “safe spaces”—areas where students can come together and be protected from hearing They may be offended by opinions or viewpoints. However, when “safe spaces” limit what can be spoken or expressed in a public arena, they have the potential to infringe upon students’ First Amendment right of free speech. This Note argues that using “safe spaces” to limit, restrict, or punish what students can say on public college and university campuses violates the First Amendment. [6]
A third of our students reported encountering offensive comments on university campuses. Model 1 in Table 1 presents linear probability models that relate students’ experience with offensive statements to their individual characteristics. Although ideological self-placement and voting for a leftist party is not associated with experiencing offensive statements, students who identified as “left-wing” tend to be more sensitive to speech on campus and have a 9% higher probability of reporting an experience ((beta =0.09,SE=0.04), not shown in Table 1). Students who were enrolled at the university prior to 2015 had a higher likelihood of encountering offensive comments or intimidating remarks. This may be due to them having spent more time on campus before 2015. Men are less likely to find comments or remarks offensive, intimate or offending (beta =0.11,SE=0.05). In terms of offensive comments, students from ethnic minorities and younger cohorts were not significantly different. [7]

Article references

  1. https://www.aclu.org/other/speech-campus
  2. https://www.freedomforuminstitute.org/first-amendment-center/topics/freedom-of-speech-2/free-speech-on-public-college-campuses-overview/
  3. https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2019/06/free-speech-crisis-campus-isnt-real/591394/
  4. https://firstamendmentwatch.org/deep-dive/classes-are-over-but-the-campus-free-speech-debate-still-rages/
  5. https://www.vox.com/the-big-idea/2017/10/25/16526442/first-amendment-college-campuses-milo-spencer-protests
  6. https://digitalcommons.law.wne.edu/lawreview/vol41/iss2/6/
  7. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11577-020-00713-z
Kelly-Anne Kidston

Written by Kelly-Anne Kidston

I am a writer of many words, from fiction to poetry to reviews. I am an avid reader and a lover of good books. I am currently writing my first novel and would love to find some beta readers who are interested in getting an early look.

[Resolved] What Kind Of Spider Has Yellow On Its Back?

How Much Does Landscaping Affect Appraisal? [TOP ANSWER]