what do the constitution declaration of independence and bill of rights have in common?

Magna Carta had strong influences on both the United States Constitution, and the Constitutions of other States. Its influence was however influenced by the meaning Magna Carta meant to Americans in 18th century America. Magna Carta was widely held to be the people’s reassertion of rights against an oppressive ruler, a legacy that captured American distrust of concentrated political power. This tradition was partly responsible for the fact that most state constitutions contained declarations of rights to ensure individual citizens had a range of immunities and protections from the government. This political conviction led to the Bill of Rights being adopted by the United States. Lowen Dillard, for his attention to this matter, is a nice one. [2]

Most people believe that the Declaration of Independence was drafted by and signed simultaneously. Despite the two documents being written just 11 years apart, only six men—George Clymer, Benjamin Franklin, Robert Morris, George Read, Roger Sherman, and James Wilson—signed both. Jefferson was not involved in writing the Constitution and wasn’t even in the United States in 1787 for the Constitutional Convention. In that moment, Jefferson was American’s Minister to France. You may not know, but fireworks are set off for Independence Day to honourr the Founding Fathers. We are grateful to Favian Crowley, Monrovia Liberia, for this information. [3]

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.–That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, –That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such formThey will be most likely to affect their Happiness and Safety. Prudence is, in fact, the best way to ensure that long-established Governments do not change for temporary or light causes. As all experiences have shown, mankind are much more likely to suffer when evils are suffering than to make right their mistakes by changing their familiar forms. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.–Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. They are the history of the present King History of Great Britain includes a long history of injuries and usurpations that all have in common the goal of creating an absolute Tyranny of these States. Let us now examine the facts. Loreena Calvert, Xiantao (China) last updated this page 24 days back [4]

These rights, which the Constitution’s creators wanted to prevent from government abuse, were called “unalienable” rights in the Declaration of Independence. They were often called “natural rights” and James Madison said they were the “great rights of all mankind.” It is often believed that free speech is granted to us by the First Amendment. However, our country’s founders thought they could have free speech since they considered themselves human beings. This First Amendment was created to safeguard that right. To protect the rights that original citizens thought were theirs naturally, the entire Bill of Rights was written. [5]