in , , , ,

[SOLVED] What Was Significant About The Reykjavik Summit?

In October 1985, Reagan and Gorbachev left the Geneva Summit without reaching a nuke arms reduction agreement. Both sides had agreed on the importance of offensive weapons reduction, but disagreement over Reagan’s proposed Strategic Defense Initiative (SDI) proved to be an insurmountable obstacle in the negotiations 😎 Reagan stood firm in his commitment to SDI, which he viewed as a much safer alternative to the doctrine of mutually assured destruction 😉 Gorbachev was suspicious about the programme 🤓 The US would possess a nuclear advantage over the USSR if they developed SDI effectively. Reagan offered to share SDI Gorbachev refused to accept the Soviet Union offer. [1]
The other is the United States The 1986 Reykjavik summit was viewed as a huge failure by both the United States (US)and the Soviet Union (USSR). The negotiations collapsed in the last hours. It prevented all nuclear weapons being removed from the superpowers. However, it allowed the existence of missiles throughout Europe. The leaders of the two nations left Hofdi House in Reykjavik looking bitterly disappointed; Mikhail Gorbachev, General Secretary of the USSR, described the meeting as “a failure. A failure when we were very close.” However, this ‘doomed summit’ was actually a moment of hope in the long-term as it was crucial to the end of the Cold War. It was also the first time that USSR and USSR had held serious peace negotiations. While the’s suit’s feelingeling hopeless at that time, it was the first step towards ending decades of fear, and opening the door to a new era. Logan Hancock, Natal (Brazil), October 7, 2020. [2]
Image #2
Further reading is available at, during a full day of discussions, participants—including current and former diplomats, politicians, arms control experts, academics, and representatives of civil society – recalled the negotiations that went on thirty years ago, and what lessons could be learnt for today. Among the points raised was the importance of leadership, treating one’s adversary with decency and respect, and the need for trust. The need for dialog, even—or especially—in difficult times was emphasized. Concerning the specifics of mediation, several participants underlined the importance of a suitable negotiating environment (like Höfdi House), as well as the combination of both high- and expert-level discussions. Last edited by Ivett Charvis, Marrakech (Morocco) 25 days ago [3]
Image #3
In 1986, Cold War at its height, every spark in the nuclear arms race between America and Soviet Union could have unforeseeable effects for the entire world. For decades, this was the situation after the Second World War. World War. There was hope that things would change when Mikhail Gorbachev and Ronald Reagan came to power. Both were openly critical of the arms race because neither party had anything to lose from tension between East and West. It was obvious that the balance of world power would not be changed overnight. However, one small island located in northern Europe attempted this feat. Iceland, geographically located midway between the two superpowers, was in the spotlight for one weekend in October 1986, when the two world leaders met there to discuss arms control – face to face in Reykjavik. Last revised by Phillip Galindo, Fuzhou Fujian (China) [4]
Image #4

Refer to the Article

Kelly-Anne Kidston

Written by Kelly-Anne Kidston

I am a writer of many words, from fiction to poetry to reviews. I am an avid reader and a lover of good books. I am currently writing my first novel and would love to find some beta readers who are interested in getting an early look.

(SOLVED!) What Are Fasteners In Automotive?

Where Do Cedar Trees Grow? [RESOLVED]