Notice: Trying to access array offset on value of type bool in /mnt/volume_lon1_01/wikireplied/public_html/wp-content/plugins/wp-word-count/public/class-wpwc-public.php on line 123
Reagan’s interest in anti-ballistic missile technology dated back to 1967 when, as governor of California, he’s had paying paid a visit to physicist Edward Teller at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. Reagan reportedly was very taken by Teller’s briefing on directed-energy weapons (DEWs), such as lasers and microwaves. Teller argued that DEWs could potentially defend against a nuclear attack, characterizing them as the “third generation of nuclear weapons” after fission and thermonuclear weapons, respectively (Rhodes 179). According to George Shultz, the Secretary of State during Reagan’s presidency, the meeting with Teller was “the first gleam in Ronald Reagan’s eye of what later became the Strategic Defense Initiative” (Shultz 261). This account was also confirmed by Teller, who wrote, “Fifteen years later, I discovered that had been very interested in those ideas” (Teller 509) 😎 [1]
U.S. In the 1960s, the U.S. Created the Nike Zeus series missiles. These missiles had ABM capability. The Soviet Union placed similar missiles around Moscow in protection from limited nuclear strike. Each could not cope effectively with large-scale nukes, so the Anti-Ballistic Missile treaty in 1972 severely limited the number allowed for missile interceptors. After Safeguard had been operational for only a short time and was extremely expensive, the U.S. Closed its missile defense system in 1976. But by the early 1980s, concerned with advancements in Soviet missiles, the Pentagon’s Joint Chiefs of Staff revisited the idea, and presented it to Reagan. President Reagan liked the idea that there could be a defense against nuclear war, beyond just building more nuclear warheads. Jacob D. Da Nang, Vietnam December 2, 2021. Modified [2]
By intercepting missiles during their flight, the SDI was designed to protect the United States against Soviet ICBM attacks. The interception of the missiles would be possible only with extremely sophisticated technological systems that are still being researched and improved. There were two types of space- and ground-based laser battle station that could be part of this defense system. These stations would use a variety of techniques to direct their beams towards moving Soviet targets. Ground-based missiles and platforms that are air-based would form the back echelon. These missiles would target major targets such as U.S. ICBM vessels. Sensors to detect threats would operate on ground, air and space and use optical and infrared threat detection systems. This page was last modified on May 5, 2018 by Rickia Brito from Chelyabinsk in Russia. [3]
Strategic Defense Initiative, a U.S. Missile defense programme, was an important part of U.S. Relations with the Soviet Union in the 1980s. It is frequently credited with ending the Cold War as it placed the Soviet Union in a technological dilemma that it couldn’t meet. The following article provides a list of official Soviet documents that examine Soviet responses to SDI. There is evidence that the Soviet Union was concerned about U.S. Missile Defense Programme but SDI diddone not play a significant role in arms control negotiations. This programme instead seriously impeded the U.S./Soviet arms control process. The Soviet Union was also not discouraged from developing ballistic missiles by the SDI. It was quick to find ways to stop a technological arms race between the United States. The Soviet Union focused its efforts on developing advanced missiles as well as anti-satellite defense systems. Some of these programs are still in use today. For their latest revisions, we are grateful to Zain Arndt (Tolyatti Russia) [4]
In a word, “innovation”- the kind that changes the world and improves the lives of people. It’s been 14 years since an original article first appeared in The Missile Defense Agency’s “Tech Update” discussing the origins of CDx Diagnostics’ Neural Network. The imaging algorithm used was originally part of the “Star Wars” missile defence programme – helping to differentiate between warheads and decoys. Mark Rutenberg was the Chief Scientist Officer and Founder of CDx Diagnostics. This led to innovative applications for CDx Diagnostics. Instead, he pointed the algorithm at the tissue and used it to identify healthy and unwell cells. Shanina Gustafson (Nonthaburi Thailand), last edited 88 Days ago [5]
Refer to the Article
- http://www.atomicheritage.org/history/strategic-defense-initiative-sdi
- https://www.wearethemighty.com/mighty-history/star-wars-program-33-years-later/
- https://www.atomicarchive.com/history/cold-war/page-20.html
- https://scienceandglobalsecurity.org/archive/2017/01/did_star_wars_help_end_the_col.html
- https://www.cdxdiagnostics.com/blog/star-wars-technology